EVERYONE has their own way of doing things on social media, and we all use it for different reasons.
Up until a couple of months ago, I only really used Twitter for newsgathering (I used to be an online journalist) and never really said very much. I wasn't concerned about getting followers and didn't really engage with people on there. I'd often look, but rarely talk back.
Then I realised that, in the media industry, you are judged on how many followers you have (it's a shallow world, I know) and I had some catching up to do. Now I'm by no means a celebrity on Twitter - I only have about 1,200 followers at the time of writing - but I have got there from only a couple of hundred when I started working in social in February.
Fortunately for me, I'd been posting in a professional capacity to Twitter for quite some time, so I had a pretty decent idea of what works and what doesn't. And since starting as a full-time social guy I've picked up a few more. So I thought I'd share with you what meagre knowledge I have...
DO use pictures. Pictures are far FAR more engaging than words alone. There is a reason why sites like Instagram and Imgur are so successful. We are all generally very lazy, and pictures are much easier to take in than words. This means your audience is instantly much bigger when you use them. And if the content is good, it means there are more people to share it.
If you need help getting the best out of your pics on social, here's a blog that can help by Buffer, a company who did a study into tweeting pictures. They found tweets with pics got 89% more favorites and 150% more retweets than tweets with just text.
DO talk to people. You get what you give on Twitter. I've lost count of the amount of real-life conversations I've had with people who say they signed up to Twitter but then got bored and went back to Facebook, or just didn't bother at all.
It will be boring if you're not doing anything. It's all about conversation. People won't know you're there if you don't tell them, and they won't want to follow you unless they think you've got something interesting to say.
DO work out why you're there. Twitter is a fantastic place for niche interests. Of course, some people will get away with being very broad and talking about all sorts of things. But they tend to be people who are already in the public sphere. The best Twitter accounts are the ones that have a specific purpose - a news site, or celebrity gossip feed, or a football expert, or whatever.
So if you love Carp Fishing, for example, then put that in your profile and talk to other people who share your hobby. They are much more likely to want to talk to you than a bunch of strangers. And you'll find you get much more enjoyment out of using Twitter if you're talking about something you enjoy.
DON'T troll people you don't know. Everyone loves a bit of banter. And if you have a mate in the office who supports a rival football team, then it can be great fun winding them up online. But remember, Twitter is a public forum. Don't say anything you wouldn't want a potential employer to read.
Streams of angry bile and replies full of derogatory remarks just don't look nice. If you saw a pub where everyone was shouting filth at each other, would you go in for a pint? Of course you wouldn't. So don't be that angry drunk at the bar.
DON'T give up. Rome wasn't built in a day, and a million followers won't just turn up overnight. It takes time to build up a following on Twitter and there are no shortcuts.
DON'T buy followers. I'm sure you will have seen or heard of websites where you can just pay for as many followers as you like. But as with most things in life, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Those sites will get you lots of followers, but all of them will be dead accounts. The sites create the accounts (some make them look real with pictures and posts, some don't even bother with that) and then follow you. Then repeat as many times as you've paid them to.
These fakes won't help you to enjoy using Twitter, as you still won't get anybody talking to you. You'll be like the king of an empty country. Plus, anyone can audit your account to see how many fake followers you have. Imagine how embarrassing it would be if someone you know checked out yours, only to find that you've just gone out and bought thousands of fake friends.
Thursday, 31 July 2014
Saturday, 19 July 2014
Gaza, Twitter, and the worst picture I've ever seen
CONFLICT around the world is not new - and conflict in the Gaza Strip certainly isn't. But the way it is being recorded and broadcast is changing.
The most recent bouts of fighting in Gaza have been documented in shockingly graphic detail by the people who live there, and the pictures can now be seen on Twitter and elsewhere by anyone.
This hasn't happened before, mostly because there are some things the mainstream media simply cannot, or will not, show.
Images and words can be deemed too shocking, and editorial standards simply won't allow for the publication of pictures thought to be too graphic or distressing.
This image, for example, has not to my knowledge been distributed by any mainstream media outlet.
It is, I think, the most disturbing I've ever seen. I really can't imagine anything worse. It is a brutal encapsulation of everything that is horrific about war, and I challenge anyone to look at it and not have an intensely emotional reaction.
Now, I can understand why editors would decide not show this picture to their viewers or readers. But I believe they are wrong to withhold it, and others like it.
I think it's important the world sees these awful things so they can better understand what really happens when an army drops bombs on civilian populations. Censored pictures and expert analysis simply do not have the same impact.
I should be clear here that I'm not trying to make any kind of political statement about who is right and who is wrong in this conflict. I'm not qualified to do that, and you can all make your own minds up.
But the politics is beside the point. All I want to highlight here is the fact that uncensored social networks have given us a new window into the true horrors of this war. And I hope that this increased global awareness will help to stop it.
I should also point out that the pictures featured here haven't been verified by mainstream media outlets, so their origin and authenticity are undoubtedly less certain than others. But the sheer number of them would indicate that at least some will be genuine, if not all.
Either way, the impact remains the same.
We all now have the resources to educate ourselves far beyond what we see on BBC News at Ten - and we all have a responsibility to use them.
For more info, search: #PrayForGaza, #GazaUnderAttack, #IsraelUnderFire
![]() |
| PrayForGaza: A hashtag many have used to share information about the conflict |
The most recent bouts of fighting in Gaza have been documented in shockingly graphic detail by the people who live there, and the pictures can now be seen on Twitter and elsewhere by anyone.
This hasn't happened before, mostly because there are some things the mainstream media simply cannot, or will not, show.
A young boy says good bay for his father in Gaza this morning...
#GazaUnderAttack #PrayForGaza pic.twitter.com/wHqcWatn7i
— فلسطين i (@iFalasteen) July 19, 2014
Images and words can be deemed too shocking, and editorial standards simply won't allow for the publication of pictures thought to be too graphic or distressing.
This image, for example, has not to my knowledge been distributed by any mainstream media outlet.
Israel kills most dangerous terrorist
#PrayForGaza
#Palestine
#IsraelUnderFire
#GazaUnderAttack pic.twitter.com/QQaiB70JjI
— ماجد القشعمي#GAZA (@_majed_q) July 11, 2014
It is, I think, the most disturbing I've ever seen. I really can't imagine anything worse. It is a brutal encapsulation of everything that is horrific about war, and I challenge anyone to look at it and not have an intensely emotional reaction.
Now, I can understand why editors would decide not show this picture to their viewers or readers. But I believe they are wrong to withhold it, and others like it.
Pregnant Palestinian woman gets shot, gives birth to child who was also shot. #PrayForGaza #PrayForPalestine pic.twitter.com/dYoBJpTQOJ
— كاشف Kash (@_wizkid_) July 11, 2014
I think it's important the world sees these awful things so they can better understand what really happens when an army drops bombs on civilian populations. Censored pictures and expert analysis simply do not have the same impact.
I should be clear here that I'm not trying to make any kind of political statement about who is right and who is wrong in this conflict. I'm not qualified to do that, and you can all make your own minds up.
His dead little brother in his arms. #PrayForGaza pic.twitter.com/btI9omlSuV
— Mina (@mina_ysf) July 19, 2014
But the politics is beside the point. All I want to highlight here is the fact that uncensored social networks have given us a new window into the true horrors of this war. And I hope that this increased global awareness will help to stop it.
this makes me want to be physically sick so so cruel cannot process the complete inhumanity wow #PrayForGaza pic.twitter.com/eb3mK1ja3j
— icks (@cadburyhxrry) July 13, 2014
I should also point out that the pictures featured here haven't been verified by mainstream media outlets, so their origin and authenticity are undoubtedly less certain than others. But the sheer number of them would indicate that at least some will be genuine, if not all.
don't cry, baby. don't cry. #PrayForGaza pic.twitter.com/OUuenKXizW
— Lucaspeebo. (@Lucaspeebo) July 13, 2014
Either way, the impact remains the same.
We all now have the resources to educate ourselves far beyond what we see on BBC News at Ten - and we all have a responsibility to use them.
✨ Surely with hardship comes ease. QUR'AN 95:5 ✨ #PrayForGaza #FreePalestineOrDieTrying pic.twitter.com/xLsLnqkg5c
— Linda لو لو (@falasteenager) July 12, 2014
For more info, search: #PrayForGaza, #GazaUnderAttack, #IsraelUnderFire
Friday, 11 July 2014
War of the World Cup - How UK news sites are making the most of sport social
THE World Cup is the biggest event Twitter has ever seen. More than 35.6 million Tweets were sent during Brazil's 7-1 defeat against Germany, making it the most tweeted-about sports game ever.
The match also set a new record for the number of tweets per minute, when it peaked at 580,166 after Germany scored their fourth goal.
This huge number of online users means there is a massive audience waiting for tweeters looking to drive traffic back to their own sites.
News sites are among the biggest of these, and this blog will focus on them. Another huge area is online gambling, which I'll talk about in my next one.
If you've read my previous blog, you'll know that news sites have a big advantage on social, because they've always got new, engaging content to talk about.
But this advantage is diminished during matches, because everyone is watching them and everyone is throwing content straight out there. There is no first-look or behind-the-scenes access to rely on.
This being said, the main players - including our team at The Sun - still do a pretty good job.
The Mirror
The Mirror relies on written humour a lot of the time, and their writers are very funny. Which is a good job, because their graphical content is not great.
They often post images like the one below, which looks nice, but is really not very shareable. It gives you no new information, doesn't make you laugh, and is certainly not something you just have to show your mates...
They also have some sort of gambling tie-up, which sees them posting lots of little cards like this one:
Engagement isn't great on this either. I assume that's because most people can't work out exactly how the competition works. It seems to give entrants a chance of winning £100,000 by correctly predicting who will win. But that is either not interesting, or confusing, because the tweet only had one reply - the word 'Argentina' - which is obviously not stated in the correct format. It wasn't retweeted or favourited at all.
The Telegraph
Almost all sport stories on The Telegraph's football account are accompanied by pictures - which is always a good start. They rarely miss a big story, and their copy is usually short, sharp and to the point.
The stand-out feature of their sport social for me, though, is the way they use diagrams and data visualisation. These things are shareable in their own right, and also make you want to click to see more.
They all tend to link back to their 'Project Babb' site - an experimental digital offerring which is obviously optimised for multi-platform access. It's snappy, picture-heavy and encourages users to scroll in a wide Buzzfeed-y sort of way.
The content they have seems to translate well onto social, and they get a good response.
The Times
The Times' football coverage on social is so woeful it's almost non-existent.
The @TimesFootball account appears to have been abandoned in March, when its last tweet was posted. It has just 391 followers and has only ever posted two pictures.
The @TimesSport account is obviously the one used for all football content. But even here the quality isn't much better.
Almost all tweets are picture-less and struggle to get any engagement at all. And RTs like this one from their archive are as baffling as they are dull.
Time to move on...
The Mail
The Mail use their sport account to post plenty of pictures and get good engagement. They also tend to use vines of footage, like this:
The problem with these though, is that they almost certainly don't own the rights to show the clips. Many people I've spoken to in the industry think this is going to have to catch up with them at some point.
It's one thing for a guy with 500 followers to post six-seconds of in-game footage - it's quite another for a large media organisation to do so, particularly if they have no deal in place. And we can tell they have no deal in place, because no one does. And if they did, they would be using far more vines of much better quality.
One of their vines was actually removed in the time it's taken me to write this blog.
The Sun
These restrictions have meant we at The Sun have had to get quite creative with our ideas. Images and vines are good, but they have to be funny or entertaining, and come without legal copyright issues.
So here's a couple of things we tried during Argentina's semi-final victory over Holland.
First is this venn diagram. It was cooked up quickly in photoshop (which explains it's somewhat amateurish appearance), but our followers seemed to love it.
Our football account also uses creative graphics to deliver stats, team news and stories.
It also posts out some cool custom-made videos like the one below, which features the Premier League footage The Sun bought the rights to.
Seen something you think I should be writing about? Get in touch on Twitter @TheTommyEdwards.
![]() |
| A Brazil fan enjoys the most tweeted-about World Cup ever |
The match also set a new record for the number of tweets per minute, when it peaked at 580,166 after Germany scored their fourth goal.
This huge number of online users means there is a massive audience waiting for tweeters looking to drive traffic back to their own sites.
News sites are among the biggest of these, and this blog will focus on them. Another huge area is online gambling, which I'll talk about in my next one.
![]() |
| Germany players pose for an incredibly shareable on-pitch selfie |
If you've read my previous blog, you'll know that news sites have a big advantage on social, because they've always got new, engaging content to talk about.
But this advantage is diminished during matches, because everyone is watching them and everyone is throwing content straight out there. There is no first-look or behind-the-scenes access to rely on.
This being said, the main players - including our team at The Sun - still do a pretty good job.
The Mirror
The Mirror relies on written humour a lot of the time, and their writers are very funny. Which is a good job, because their graphical content is not great.
They often post images like the one below, which looks nice, but is really not very shareable. It gives you no new information, doesn't make you laugh, and is certainly not something you just have to show your mates...
*30 MORE MINUTES KLAXON*
http://t.co/0wbn6fcKXJ pic.twitter.com/1t5MSnlou0
— Mirror Football (@MirrorFootball) July 9, 2014
They also have some sort of gambling tie-up, which sees them posting lots of little cards like this one:
Forecast Frenzy longest streak standings here as it hots up - http://t.co/SLbAOrkpvW pic.twitter.com/bYCftZjLvL
— Mirror Football (@MirrorFootball) July 10, 2014
Engagement isn't great on this either. I assume that's because most people can't work out exactly how the competition works. It seems to give entrants a chance of winning £100,000 by correctly predicting who will win. But that is either not interesting, or confusing, because the tweet only had one reply - the word 'Argentina' - which is obviously not stated in the correct format. It wasn't retweeted or favourited at all.
The Telegraph
Almost all sport stories on The Telegraph's football account are accompanied by pictures - which is always a good start. They rarely miss a big story, and their copy is usually short, sharp and to the point.
The stand-out feature of their sport social for me, though, is the way they use diagrams and data visualisation. These things are shareable in their own right, and also make you want to click to see more.
How Brazil were dismantled by Germany, featuring fancy diagrams:
http://t.co/wYa56u83OS
#babb pic.twitter.com/AV0KRCpPWp
— Telegraph Football (@TeleFootball) July 10, 2014
They all tend to link back to their 'Project Babb' site - an experimental digital offerring which is obviously optimised for multi-platform access. It's snappy, picture-heavy and encourages users to scroll in a wide Buzzfeed-y sort of way.
The Anatomy of a Drubbing: analysing Brazil 1-7 Germany.
http://t.co/wYa56u83OS
#babb pic.twitter.com/8Pojoewdry
— Telegraph Football (@TeleFootball) July 10, 2014
The content they have seems to translate well onto social, and they get a good response.
The Anatomy of a Drubbing: Brazil 1-7 Germany
http://t.co/wYa56u83OS
#babb pic.twitter.com/KUGcaSiZRs
— Telegraph Football (@TeleFootball) July 10, 2014
The Times
The Times' football coverage on social is so woeful it's almost non-existent.
The @TimesFootball account appears to have been abandoned in March, when its last tweet was posted. It has just 391 followers and has only ever posted two pictures.
The @TimesSport account is obviously the one used for all football content. But even here the quality isn't much better.
Almost all tweets are picture-less and struggle to get any engagement at all. And RTs like this one from their archive are as baffling as they are dull.
G. Bernard Shaw says making schoolboys do athletics won't stop them masturbating #SexEducation #100yearsago pic.twitter.com/ndm6UuyiCw
— Rose Wild (@TimesArchive) July 11, 2014
Time to move on...
The Mail
The Mail use their sport account to post plenty of pictures and get good engagement. They also tend to use vines of footage, like this:
FULL TIME: #ARG 0-0 #NED The chess continued in the second half too. This vine summarizes it! http://t.co/ZcDr8Ox68R https://t.co/JVsLe23kgJ
— MailOnline Sport (@MailSport) July 9, 2014
The problem with these though, is that they almost certainly don't own the rights to show the clips. Many people I've spoken to in the industry think this is going to have to catch up with them at some point.
It's one thing for a guy with 500 followers to post six-seconds of in-game footage - it's quite another for a large media organisation to do so, particularly if they have no deal in place. And we can tell they have no deal in place, because no one does. And if they did, they would be using far more vines of much better quality.
One of their vines was actually removed in the time it's taken me to write this blog.
The Sun
These restrictions have meant we at The Sun have had to get quite creative with our ideas. Images and vines are good, but they have to be funny or entertaining, and come without legal copyright issues.
So here's a couple of things we tried during Argentina's semi-final victory over Holland.
First is this venn diagram. It was cooked up quickly in photoshop (which explains it's somewhat amateurish appearance), but our followers seemed to love it.
The Dutch have REALLY kept Lionel Messi quiet in this match. Here's a diagram to demonstrate... #NEDvsARG pic.twitter.com/Tf4xZCb2ur
— The Sun (@TheSunNewspaper) July 9, 2014
Next was this one, which I did when it became clear the game would go to penalties. It took less than two minutes to do, but was really effective at playing on the fact that everyone knows Messi is Argentina's best player by far.
LEAKED: Sabella's preferred list of Argentina penalty takers... pic.twitter.com/SCDW3eNfx2
— The Sun (@TheSunNewspaper) July 9, 2014
Our football account also uses creative graphics to deliver stats, team news and stories.
It also posts out some cool custom-made videos like the one below, which features the Premier League footage The Sun bought the rights to.
Is Luis Suarez leaving a bad thing? Hmmm. Well here's NINE reasons why he'll be missed http://t.co/YVtnVjFk0v
— The Sun - Football (@TheSunFootball) July 11, 2014
Seen something you think I should be writing about? Get in touch on Twitter @TheTommyEdwards.
Thursday, 10 July 2014
What would Jesus do? Twitter users to decide what team Christ The Redeemer supports
TWITTER users are set to decide which World Cup finalist Christ the Redeemer supports - by choosing the colours he's lit up in.
Users can tweet to vote on whether the world famous statue will be illuminated in the black, red and amber of Germany, or Argentine sky blue and white.
To vote, all you have to do is tweet the hashtag #ArmsWideOpen, then the 'hashflag' of your favourite finalist - either #GER or #ARG.
The colours of the winning team will be projected onto the statue on Saturday night between 7 & 9pm local time, any they will change in real-time as votes continue flooding in.
Great - now all you have to do is decide who the hell you're going to support!
Users can tweet to vote on whether the world famous statue will be illuminated in the black, red and amber of Germany, or Argentine sky blue and white.
To vote, all you have to do is tweet the hashtag #ArmsWideOpen, then the 'hashflag' of your favourite finalist - either #GER or #ARG.
The colours of the winning team will be projected onto the statue on Saturday night between 7 & 9pm local time, any they will change in real-time as votes continue flooding in.
Great - now all you have to do is decide who the hell you're going to support!
Wednesday, 2 July 2014
Chewy Luis in the news: Why the soap opera is more important than the sport
SPORT is big business on social media, and big events get loads of coverage - but it's not always the matches themselves that people want to talk about.
Three of the biggest stories we've ever had on social at The Sun revolved around football stars Luis Suarez and Cristiano Ronaldo - and boxing champion Carl Froch. None of them really had very much to do with sport.
![]() |
| Bit off more than he could chew: Luis Suarez after chomping on Chiellini |
Three of the biggest stories we've ever had on social at The Sun revolved around football stars Luis Suarez and Cristiano Ronaldo - and boxing champion Carl Froch. None of them really had very much to do with sport.
The first was a story about Froch proposing to his girlfriend in the ring in front of thousands of people, immediately after knocking out rival George Groves.
What a champ! Carl Froch won the bout of his life - then went down on one knee in the ring: http://t.co/4xaZD8JJy5 pic.twitter.com/9M9qNWNlVj
— The Sun (@TheSunNewspaper) June 1, 2014
We posted some amazing pictures of a battle-weary Froch getting down on one knee, which our followers on Facebook loved. The tweet about the same story (above) also did very well.
Second is a story about Cristiano Ronaldo getting a zig zag haircut during the World Cup. The star got his new look in tribute to a boy whose £50,000 brain surgery he paid for. It's a real feel-good tale that was incredibly popular with readers.
The story had a magic combination of three things: the most popular sportsman on social media (Ronaldo has over 27 million followers on Twitter), the most popular sporting event in the world and, crucially, a brilliant human interest angle.
![]() |
| Cristiano the redeemer: Ronaldo's hair was a tribute to ill fan |
The story had a magic combination of three things: the most popular sportsman on social media (Ronaldo has over 27 million followers on Twitter), the most popular sporting event in the world and, crucially, a brilliant human interest angle.
The third of our big hitters is a story that has dominated the news agenda ever since it happened - Luis Suarez biting opponent Giorgio Chiellini on the shoulder. You'd have to have been living under a rock to have missed this one.
So what do these three stories have in common?
They are all very famous sportsmen at the top of their game, on a global stage, doing something which is NOT sport. The stories show us that it is often what the big stars do outside of the game that people are interested in.
There is a kind of public fascination with the fact that these revered, almost god-like, sporting heroes are just real people with real emotions that do real, everyday things. Like giving to the needy, proposing to their partners - or stupidly lashing out when they are angry.
The sport itself is just a platform for a much broader dramatic narrative about fearless heroes, pantomime villains and ancient, unappeasable rivalries.
![]() |
| The moment of madness: Suarez gets his teeth into rival Chiellini |
The sport itself is just a platform for a much broader dramatic narrative about fearless heroes, pantomime villains and ancient, unappeasable rivalries.
The games and the goals are just a part of that. A very important part, of course, but not the full package. The press conferences, interviews and ad campaigns all have their roles to play. And so does social media.
Suarez's bite on Chiellini was generating a staggering 107,000 tweets per minute during the game - including this gem from former boxer Evander Holyfield...
I guess any part of the body is up for eating.
— Evander Holyfield (@holyfield) June 24, 2014
Mentions of Suarez (@Luis16Suarez) on the day also went up from 100k before the bite, to about TWO MILLION after.
A few days later, when he apologised on Twitter, the post was re-tweeted over 70,000 times and will have been seen by millions of people.
I should mention here that there are hundreds of millions of tweets posted about the matches themselves, which are incredibly exciting in their own right.
But the point I'm trying to make is that social messages achieve huge success when there is that potent mix of both a massive sporting occasion AND some other kind of drama, which combine to create a bigger picture.
And, of course, social media managers like me are happy, because it means we get a chance to hop on photoshop and have some fun.
Once Suarez had been handed a four-month ban for the bite, we came up with this idea:
A few days later, when he apologised on Twitter, the post was re-tweeted over 70,000 times and will have been seen by millions of people.
My apologies to Chiellini: pic.twitter.com/CvfkkjxzlM
— Luis Suarez (@luis16suarez) June 30, 2014
I should mention here that there are hundreds of millions of tweets posted about the matches themselves, which are incredibly exciting in their own right.
But the point I'm trying to make is that social messages achieve huge success when there is that potent mix of both a massive sporting occasion AND some other kind of drama, which combine to create a bigger picture.
And, of course, social media managers like me are happy, because it means we get a chance to hop on photoshop and have some fun.
Once Suarez had been handed a four-month ban for the bite, we came up with this idea:
How many months, Luis? pic.twitter.com/KUeAdtCKwc
— The Sun (@TheSunNewspaper) June 26, 2014
As you can see, I've given Luis an extra finger. Or, rather, extended his ring finger out. His celebration usually has just his thumb and two fingers raised, which most fans will know. The third finger was added for comic effect, so Luis could gleefully demonstrate how many months he'll be banned from football for.
To create the extra digit, I had to cut out his middle finger and move it across. I then blended it in using the clone stamp and blur tool.
To finish up, here's some other Suarez-related funnies that caught my eye...
To create the extra digit, I had to cut out his middle finger and move it across. I then blended it in using the clone stamp and blur tool.
To finish up, here's some other Suarez-related funnies that caught my eye...
Hey @luis16suarez, if you're that hungry, why not get your teeth stuck into something really tasty? pic.twitter.com/TPrPoC6ljt
— Nando's (@NandosUK) June 24, 2014
Finally, a picture from the Luis Suarez bite that isn't photoshopped! pic.twitter.com/5x0J01GXTG
— Sunday League Footy (@SundayChants) June 25, 2014
Update from Luis Suarez' house.. pic.twitter.com/oeFJBm0DTP
— Paddy Power (@paddypower) June 28, 2014
Suarez has sent in his response after his 4 month ban pic.twitter.com/KZjDA8ADHK
— Troll Football (@Troll__Football) June 26, 2014
Friday, 27 June 2014
Chat's Life - inspiring conversation with graphics on social
CONVERSATION is the spice of online life, and we social media managers are always looking for ways to get people talking.
I'm luckier than most - because I work at a national newspaper. That means there is usually plenty of interesting, provocative content to get our followers going.
But a simple question written into a tweet with no image and no context is likely to get ignored by most people, regardless of how great the story is.
On our team, we decided that wouldn't do - we needed to make the question itself more engaging.
So here's what we did.
The Sun's website had been running "Have Your Say" articles for some time, and we thought it would be a good idea to try to translate this concept onto social media.
The first - and most obvious - thing to do was create a hashtag from the title. This would give continuity to our feed and mean regular readers would come to expect the #HaveYourSay tweets.
We then started to work on some ideas for graphics. The hashtag itself on a Sun red background in a Sun font was the first idea, which worked OK - but I thought we could have a bit more fun with it.
So the next idea I had was to use a graphic (600x300 pix) which had the hashtag, a question and an picture from the story we were referring to. This would show the question and the context in one concise, eye-catching, shareable image.
We now try to do these as often as possible, and move the words and pictures around to keep it interesting. But, of course, the style (ie. colour and font) remain the same to give consistency to the concept, and to make it more recognisable.
What do you think? #HaveYourSay!
I'm luckier than most - because I work at a national newspaper. That means there is usually plenty of interesting, provocative content to get our followers going.
![]() |
| Original graphic: Simple, but effective |
But a simple question written into a tweet with no image and no context is likely to get ignored by most people, regardless of how great the story is.
On our team, we decided that wouldn't do - we needed to make the question itself more engaging.
So here's what we did.
The Sun's website had been running "Have Your Say" articles for some time, and we thought it would be a good idea to try to translate this concept onto social media.
![]() |
| Roxanne: This was my first go at making a graphic. Unfortunately, I saved it as a jpeg (rather than png) file so the text looks a bit wobbly. But it still had a great response from followers |
The first - and most obvious - thing to do was create a hashtag from the title. This would give continuity to our feed and mean regular readers would come to expect the #HaveYourSay tweets.
![]() |
| Baby steps: The drop shadow is improved on this one and the hashtag reads better |
We then started to work on some ideas for graphics. The hashtag itself on a Sun red background in a Sun font was the first idea, which worked OK - but I thought we could have a bit more fun with it.
![]() |
| Big head Barlow: If you've read my previous blogs, you'll know I find over-sized heads hilarious. This is no exception. |
So the next idea I had was to use a graphic (600x300 pix) which had the hashtag, a question and an picture from the story we were referring to. This would show the question and the context in one concise, eye-catching, shareable image.
![]() |
| Translucent juice: I had to cut out the beer from the middle of the glass on this one, then increase the transparency so you can read the words through it. I think it works well. |
We now try to do these as often as possible, and move the words and pictures around to keep it interesting. But, of course, the style (ie. colour and font) remain the same to give consistency to the concept, and to make it more recognisable.
What do you think? #HaveYourSay!
Labels:
@thetommyedwards,
#haveyoursay,
cheap booze,
engagement,
facebook,
gary barlow,
hashtags,
photoshop,
social conversation,
Social Life,
social media,
sociallife,
statistics,
stats,
the sun,
Tom Edwards,
twitter
Monday, 2 June 2014
Elliot Rodger wasn't alone: The sexists, racists and homophobes going public on Twitter
CRAZED California murderer Elliot Rodger used various online forums to rant about his extreme hatred of women in the months leading up to his infamous killing spree.
This so-called 'manosphere' of 'incel' - or involuntary celibate - sites and blogs exist for angry men to paint themselves as victims of a heartless, ruthless sex culture that's ignored them. They take out their loneliness on members of the opposite sex.
But sexism isn't the only type of hatred shouting loudly on the internet. And the little-known incel forums aren't the only places these views can be found. Increasingly, people with an axe to grind are taking to much more public social networks to preach their hatred.
I went onto Twitter to search out this sexism, racism and homophobia. I wanted to know how much of it there is, and just how public these people are prepared to be.
Much of what I found is not nice, to say the least. But ignoring them won't just make it go away, and I think it's important to look objectively at these extreme, troubled opinions with a clear head.
I've listed some below so that you won't have to worry about YOUR search history being as questionable as mine now is.
WARNING: The rest of this blog contains extremely offensive language. In case it isn't already clear, I'm using these tweets only as examples of views which I personally find absolutely abhorrent.
Sexism
Misogyny and hatred towards women is often dressed up as 'Men's Rights'. This is misleading though. It gives the impression that the activists are campaigning about a genuine cause, when it is often just an excuse for thoughtless, unadulterated hatred.
Homophobia
A great deal of homophobic ranting on Twitter is dressed up as banter - the sort of stuff they still struggle to stamp out in schools (ie. 'That is so gay' or 'Why are you being such a queer?'). But not all of it follows this pattern. Some people are just spontaneously nasty.
Racism
Just like in the real world, racism takes many forms on Twitter. Some people regard their views as patriotism and often aim jibes specifically at immigrants. You also find, as in the real world, that some have hatred only for a specific race. Others are indiscriminate in their discrimination.
So why am I showing you all this?
The sheer volume of hatred of all kinds on Twitter - and there is a lot - means there are clearly issues that need to be subject to public debate. Some would argue that Twitter itself should be more strict in censoring these views. I would absolutely disagree.
Facebook has far stricter rules on censorship, which is one of the many reasons I think it's an inferior social network. Censorship essentially patronises users, telling them they are too stupid or irresponsible to make up their own minds about the offensive views of others.
I have included the above tweets in this blog precisely because I want you, the reader, to make up your own mind about them and think about the reasons they exist in the first place.
When you publish to Twitter, you publish to the world. Users know this, so the people writing these comments must believe their views to be valid on on some level. The way to combat this is not by censoring them - that would just send them underground or onto the more private forums like the ones Elliot Rodger used.
Instead, we should challenge them, write about them, and articulate clearly why these type of views don't hold any water. Everyone has the right to an opinion, after all. But we are all entitled to confront those we don't agree with.
Extreme views are nothing new. But social media has now given us all a great means of exposing and questioning them. Let's use it.
This so-called 'manosphere' of 'incel' - or involuntary celibate - sites and blogs exist for angry men to paint themselves as victims of a heartless, ruthless sex culture that's ignored them. They take out their loneliness on members of the opposite sex.
![]() |
| Elliot Rodger |
But sexism isn't the only type of hatred shouting loudly on the internet. And the little-known incel forums aren't the only places these views can be found. Increasingly, people with an axe to grind are taking to much more public social networks to preach their hatred.
I went onto Twitter to search out this sexism, racism and homophobia. I wanted to know how much of it there is, and just how public these people are prepared to be.
Much of what I found is not nice, to say the least. But ignoring them won't just make it go away, and I think it's important to look objectively at these extreme, troubled opinions with a clear head.
I've listed some below so that you won't have to worry about YOUR search history being as questionable as mine now is.
WARNING: The rest of this blog contains extremely offensive language. In case it isn't already clear, I'm using these tweets only as examples of views which I personally find absolutely abhorrent.
Sexism
Misogyny and hatred towards women is often dressed up as 'Men's Rights'. This is misleading though. It gives the impression that the activists are campaigning about a genuine cause, when it is often just an excuse for thoughtless, unadulterated hatred.
"The Girl Who Cried Rape. It really has got to the point (with me) that when someone claims they were raped, I just don’t give a fuck."
— Mister Dude (@MensRightsDude) January 12, 2013
I am not rude to women. And i dont hate them.
I am rude to bitches, sluts, hoes, non loyal women. I hate them
I also hate if they talk shit
— ⓙⓐⓒⓞⓑ ✞ (@Jacobsaenz2) June 2, 2014
Telling modern women to "go back to the kitchen" is pointless. Most wouldn't have a clue what to do. Feminism has turned them into 3 holes..
— Esoteric Traditional (@EsotericTrad) April 18, 2014
WOMEN SHOULDN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO PUBLIC EDUCATION #NoAllWomen
— MP Weezy (@blackjesus_203) May 26, 2014
Homophobia
A great deal of homophobic ranting on Twitter is dressed up as banter - the sort of stuff they still struggle to stamp out in schools (ie. 'That is so gay' or 'Why are you being such a queer?'). But not all of it follows this pattern. Some people are just spontaneously nasty.
I hate queers. Don't come near me with you fagget voice and girls jeans you fucker. ITS WRONG. GOD IS RIGHT
— Domenic (@domridesbikes4) May 30, 2014
Fuckin hate queers,someone should gas them all
— JAMES K (@CleverleyDone23) May 28, 2014
I use to not give a shit or have anything against gays but ever sense media and everyone's been making big deal about them... I hate queers.
— Conor Longmire (@C3Longmire11) May 25, 2014
Racism
Just like in the real world, racism takes many forms on Twitter. Some people regard their views as patriotism and often aim jibes specifically at immigrants. You also find, as in the real world, that some have hatred only for a specific race. Others are indiscriminate in their discrimination.
YOU PEOPLE THINK I FUCKING CARE ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS. FUCK NIGGERS, WETBACKS, JEWS FUCK EM ALL UNFOLLOW ME YOU FUCKING QUEERS.
— Jordan. (@MutePackJordy) May 28, 2014
Good fucking morning all my white brothers and sisters and fuck all u niggers Jews Muslims and spicks do us a favor kill each other faster
— mike tator (@tator_mike) May 27, 2014
Hang all niggers
— Jethro Shebo (@AngryKKKJethro) May 26, 2014
So why am I showing you all this?
The sheer volume of hatred of all kinds on Twitter - and there is a lot - means there are clearly issues that need to be subject to public debate. Some would argue that Twitter itself should be more strict in censoring these views. I would absolutely disagree.
Facebook has far stricter rules on censorship, which is one of the many reasons I think it's an inferior social network. Censorship essentially patronises users, telling them they are too stupid or irresponsible to make up their own minds about the offensive views of others.
When you publish to Twitter, you publish to the world. Users know this, so the people writing these comments must believe their views to be valid on on some level. The way to combat this is not by censoring them - that would just send them underground or onto the more private forums like the ones Elliot Rodger used.
Instead, we should challenge them, write about them, and articulate clearly why these type of views don't hold any water. Everyone has the right to an opinion, after all. But we are all entitled to confront those we don't agree with.
Extreme views are nothing new. But social media has now given us all a great means of exposing and questioning them. Let's use it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















